CompareHomeAppliances

Samsung QLED 4K Q60D (GQ65Q60D, 2024) vs Philips Ambilight OLED809 (65OLED809/12, 2024)

Samsung QLED 4K Q60D (GQ65Q60D, 2024) and Philips Ambilight OLED809 (65OLED809/12, 2024) are both televisions, compared here on public manufacturer specifications. The Philips Ambilight OLED809 (65OLED809/12, 2024) leads on refresh rate (120 vs 50 Hz). Estimated to run cheaper: the Samsung QLED 4K Q60D (GQ65Q60D, 2024), about €38/year vs €41/year at Germany's average tariff (CHA estimate from each product's own energy-label figures). Every figure here comes from a manufacturer product or datasheet page, verify against the primary source before relying on it for a purchase.

How it works1 Add appliances2 See winners3 Decide

Full data

Full spec sheet

Key differences

The specs that decide it — winner marked.

Samsung QLED 4K Q60D (GQ65Q60D, 2024) Philips Ambilight OLED809 (65OLED809/12, 2024)
Screen size (in) 65 in 65 in
Refresh rate (Hz) 50 Hz 120 Hz
Energy (A–G) E F
Samsung QLED 4K Q60D (GQ65Q60D, 2024) Wins 2/4
Philips Ambilight OLED809 (65OLED809/12, 2024) Wins 2/4
Performance
Refresh rate (Hz) 50 Hz 120 Hz
Speaker power (W) 20 W N/A
Capacity
Screen size (in) 65 in 65 in
Energy & running cost
Energy class (A–G) E F
Annual energy (kWh/yr) 96 kWh/yr 102 kWh/yr
Features
HDMI ports 3 4
USB ports 2 N/A

Frequently asked questions

Which uses less energy? +

The Samsung QLED 4K Q60D (GQ65Q60D, 2024) uses the least energy, at an estimated 96 kWh per year.

Is the Samsung QLED 4K Q60D (GQ65Q60D, 2024) better than the Philips Ambilight OLED809 (65OLED809/12, 2024)? +

On the public specs we track, the Philips Ambilight OLED809 (65OLED809/12, 2024) leads on 1 of 1 headline metrics. See the full spec sheet for the metric-by-metric breakdown.

Where does this comparison data come from? +

Every figure in the table is sourced from manufacturer product and datasheet pages and is verifiable on each product's spec page. CompareHomeAppliances does not accept vendor placement.

Keep exploring

More head-to-heads